Assessment on different tools used for Simulation of routing for Low power and lossy Networks(RPL)

Manish Mishra¹ , Piyush Shukla² , Rajeev Pandey³

¹ Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University Institute of Technology, RGPV Bhopal, India.
² Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University Institute of Technology, RGPV Bhopal, India.
³ Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University Institute of Technology, RGPV Bhopal, India.

Correspondence should be addressed to: mpmishra96@gmail.com.

Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Journal
Vol.7 , Issue.4 , pp.26-32, Aug-2019

Online published on Aug 31, 2019

Copyright © Manish Mishra, Piyush Shukla, Rajeev Pandey . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library

XML View     PDF Download

How to Cite this Paper

666 Views    413 Downloads    248 Downloads

Abstract :
RPL is the iIPv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks, standardized by IETF in i2012 as iRFC6550. specifically, RPL is designed to be a simple and inter-operable networking protocol for resource-constrained devices in industrial, home, and urban environments intended to support the division of the internet of things with thousands of devices interconnected through multihop mesh networks. More than four years have passed science the standardization of RPL, and we believe that it iis time to examine and understand its current state. In this paper, we review the history of research efforts in RPL; what aspects have been (and have not been) iinves-litigated and evaluated, how they have been studied, what was (and was not) implemented, and what remains for future investigation. We reviewed over i97 [41] iRPL-related academic research papers published by major academic publishers and present a topic-oriented survey for these research efforts. Our survey shows that only 40.2% of the papers evaluate RPL through experiments using implementations ion real embedded devices, ContikiOS and TinyOS are ithe two most popular implementations i(92.3%), and iTelosB was ithe most frequently used hardware platform i(69%) ion testbeds that have average and median size of i49.4 and i30.5 inodes, respectively. furthermore, unfortunately, despite it being approximately four years since its initial standardization, we are yet to see wide adoption of RPL as part of real-world systems and applications. We present our observations on the reasons behind this and suggest directions ion which RPL should evolve.

Key-Words / Index Term :
RPL, IPv6, routing protocol, Internet of Things (IoT), low-power and lossyinetworks (LLN), Cooja

References :
[1] T. iWinter iet ial., i“RPL: iIPv6 irouting iprotocol ifor ilow-power iand ilossy inetworks,� iInternet iEng. iTask iForce, iFremont, iCA, iUSA, iRFC i6550, iMar. i2012.

[2] O. iGnawali, iR. iFonseca, iK. iJamieson, iD. iMoss, iand iP. iLevis, i“Collection itree iprotocol,� iin iProc. iACM iInt. iConf. iEmbedded iNetw. iSensor iSyst. i(SenSys), iBerkeley, iCA, iUSA, i2009, ipp. i1–14.

[3] S. iDawson-Haggerty, iA. iTavakoli, iand iD. iCuller, i“Hydro: iA ihybrid irouting iprotocol ifor ilow-power iand ilossy inetworks,� iin iProc. iIEEE iInt. iConf. iSmart iGrid iCommun. i(SmartGridComm), iGaithersburg, iMD, iUSA, iOct. i2010, ipp. i268–273.

[4] T. iWatteyne, iEd., iet ial., i“Routing irequirements ifor iurban ilow-power iand ilossy inetworks,� iInternet iEng. iTask iForce, iFremont, iCA, iUSA, iRFC i5548, iMay i2009.

[5] E. iK. iPister, iE. iP. iThubert, iS. iDwars, iand iT. iPhinney, i“Industrial irouting irequirements iin ilow-power iand ilossy inetworks,� iInternet iEng. iTask iForce, iFremont, iCA, iUSA, iRFC i5673, iOct. i2009.

[6] A. iBrandt, iJ. iBuron, iand iG. iPorcu, i“Home iautomation irouting irequire-ments iin ilow-power iand ilossy inetworks,� iInternet iEng. iTask iForce, iFremont, iCA, iUSA, iRFC i5826, iApr. i2010.

[7] E. iJ. iMartocci, iP. iD. iMil, iN. iRiou, iand iW. iVermeylen, i“Building iautomation irouting irequirements iin ilow-power iand ilossy inetworks,� iInternet iEng. iTask iForce, iFremont, iCA, iUSA, iRFC i5867, iJun. i2010.
[8] N. iTsiftes, iJ. iEriksson, iand iA. iDunkels, i“Low-power iwireless iIPv6 irouting iwith iContikiRPL,� iin iProc. iACM/IEEE iInt. iConf. iInf. iProcess. iSensor iNetw. i(IPSN), iStockholm, iSweden, i2010, ipp. i406–407.

[9] J. iKo iet ial., i“ContikiRPL iand iTinyRPL: iHappy itogether,� iin iProc. iWorkshop iExtending iInternet iLow iPower iLossy iNetw. i(IP+SN), iApr. i2011.
[10] J. iP. iVasseur, iM. iKim, iK. iPister, iN. iDejean, iand iD. iBarthel, i“Routing imetrics iused ifor ipath icalculation iin ilow-power iand ilossy inetworks,� iInternet iEng. iTask iForce, iFremont, iCA, iUSA, iRFC i6551, iMar. i2012.

[11] P. iLevis, iT. iClausen, iJ. iHui, iO. iGnawali, iand iJ. iKo, i“The iTrickle ialgorithm,� iInternet iEng. iTask iForce, iFremont, iCA, iUSA, iRFC i6206, iMar. i2011.

[12] P. iThubert, i“Objective ifunction izero ifor ithe irouting iprotocol ifor ilow-power iand ilossy inetworks i(RPL),� iInternet iEng. iTask iForce, iFremont, iCA, iUSA, iRFC i6552, iMar. i2012.

[13] O. iGnawali iand iP. iLevis, i“The iminimum irank iwith ihysteresis iobjective ifunction,� iInternet iEng. iTask iForce, iFremont, iCA, iUSA, iRFC i6719, iSep. i2012.
[14] iJ. iKo iet ial., i“DualMOP-RPL: iSupporting imultiple imodes iof idownward irouting iin ia isingle iRPL inetwork,� iACM iTrans. iSensor iNetw., ivol. i11, ino. i2, ipp. i1–20, iMar. i2015.
[15] E. iAncillotti, iR. iBruno, iand iM. iConti, i“The irole iof ithe iRPL irout-ing iprotocol ifor ismart igrid icommunications,� iIEEE iCommun. iMag., ivol. i51, ino. i1, ipp. i75–83, iJan. i2013.
[16] E. iAncillotti, iR. iBruno, iand iM. iConti, i“Reliable idata idelivery iwith ithe iIETF irouting iprotocol ifor ilow-power iand ilossy inetworks,� iIEEE iTrans. iInd. iInformat., ivol. i10, ino. i3, ipp. i1864–1877, iAug. i2014.
i i i A. iOliveira iand iT. iVazão, i“Low-power iand ilossy inetworks iunder imobility: iA isurvey,� iComput. iNetw., ivol. i107, ipp. i339–352, iOct. i2016.

[17] I H.-S. iKim iet ial., i“MarketNet: iAn iasymmetric itransmission ipower-based iwireless isystem ifor imanaging ie-price itags iin imarkets,� iin iProc. iACM iInt. iConf. iEmbedded iNetw. iSensor iSyst. i(SenSys), iSeoul, iSouth iKorea, iNov. i2015, ipp. i281–294.
[18] iConnected iGrid iNetworks ifor iSmart iGrid—Field iArea iNetwork, iCisco, iSan iJose, iCA, iUSA, iaccessed: iMay i2017. i[Online]. iAvailable: ihttp://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/industries/energy/external-utilities-smart-grid/field-area-network.html

[19] i RIOT iOS. iAccessed: iMay i2017. i[Online]. iAvailable: ihttp://riot-os.org/api/group__net__gnrc__rpl.html
[20] i iRIOT iRPL. iAccessed: iMay i2017. i[Online]. iAvailable:ihttps://github.com/RIOT-iOS/RIOT/tree/master/sys/net/gnrc/routing/rpl

[21] i H. iPerrey, iM. iLandsmann, iO. iUgus, iM. iWählisch, iand iT. iC. iSchmidt, i“TRAIL: iTopology iauthentication iin iRPL,� iin iProc. iEur. iWorkshop iWireless iSensor iNetw. i(EWSN), iGraz, iAustria, i2016, ipp. i59–64.
[22] C. iGündogan, iC. iAdjih, iO. iHahm, iand iE. iBaccelli, i“Let ihealthy ilinks ibloom: iScalable ilink ichecks iin ilow-power iwireless inetworks ifor ismart ihealth,� iin iProc. iACM iInt. iWorkshop iPervasive iWireless iHealthcare i(MobileHealth), iPaderborn, iGermany, iJul. i2016, ipp. i11–16.

[23] I O. iBalmau iet ial., i“Evaluation iof iRPL ifor imedium ivoltage ipower iline icommunication,� iin iProc. iIEEE iInt. iConf. iSmart iGrid iCommun. i(SmartGridComm), iVenice, iItaly, iNov. i2014, ipp. i446–451.
[24] I Moteiv i iCorporation. i iTmote i iSky. i iAccessed: i iMay i i2017. i i[Online]. iAvailable: i i
i ihttp://www.moteiv.com/products/tmotesky.php

[25] iM. iP. iAndersen, iG. iFierro, iand iD. iE. iCuller, i“System idesign ifor isynergistic, ilow ipower imote/BLE iembedded iplatform,� iin iProc. iACM/IEEE iInt. iConf. iInf. iProcess. iSensor iNetw. i(IPSN), iVienna, iAustria, iApr. i2016, ipp. i1–12.

[26] N. iTsiftes iet ial., i“A iframework ifor ilow-power iIPv6 irouting isimulation, iexperimentation, iand ievaluation,� iin iProc. iACM iConf. iAppl. iTechnol. iArchit. iProtocols iComput. iCommun. i(SIGCOMM), iNew iDelhi, iIndia, iSep. i2010, ipp. i479–480.

[27] I L. iBartolozzi, iT. iPecorella, iand iR. iFantacci, i“Ns-3 iRPL imodule: iIPv6 irouting iprotocol ifor ilow ipower iand ilossy inetworks,� iin iProc. iInt. iICST iConf. iSimulat. iTools iTech. i(SIMUTOOLS), iMar. i2012, ipp. i359–366.

[28] I K. iIwanicki, i“RNFD: iRouting-layer idetection iof iDODAG i(root) inode ifailures iin ilow-power iwireless inetworks,� iin iProc. iACM/IEEE iInt. iConf. iInf. iProcess. iSensor iNetw. i(IPSN), iVienna, iAustria, iApr. i2016, iArt. ino. i13.

[29] I J. iKo, iS. iDawson-Haggerty, iO. iGnawali, iD. iCuller, iand iA. iTerzis, i“Evaluating ithe iperformance iof iRPL iand i6LoWPAN iin iTinyOS,� iin iProc. iWorkshop iExtending iInternet iLow iPower iLossy iNetw. i(IP+SN), iApr. i2011.
[30] I N. iKhelifi, iS. iOteafy, iH. iHassanein, iand iH. iYoussef, i“Proactive imaintenance iin iRPL ifor i6LowPAN,� iin iProc. iInt. iConf. iWireless iCommun. iMobile iComput. i(IWCMC), iDubrovnik, iCroatia, iAug. i2015, ipp. i993–999.
[31] i iJ. iW. iHui iand iD. iE. iCuller, i“IP iis idead, ilong ilive iIP ifor iwireless isensor inetworks,� iin iProc. iACM iInt. iConf. iEmbedded iNetw. iSensor iSyst. i(SenSys), iRaleigh, iNC, iUSA, iNov. i2008, ipp. i15–28.
[32] I S. iDawans, iS. iDuquennoy, iand iO. iBonaventure, i“On ilink iestimation iin idense iRPL ideployments,� iin iProc. iIEEE iConf. iLocal iComput. iNetw. iWorkshops, iClearwater, iFL, iUSA, iOct. i2012, ipp. i952–955.
[33] iI. iE. iKorbi, iM. iB. iBrahim, iC. iAdjih, iand iL. iA. iSaidane, i“Mobility ienhanced iRPL ifor iwireless isensor inetworks,� iin iProc. i3rd iInt. iConf. iNetw. iFuture i(NOF), iGammarth, iTunisia, iNov. i2012, ipp. i1–8.

[34] iC. iCobârzan, iJ. iMontavont, iand iT. iNoël, i“Analysis iand iperformance ievaluation iof iRPL iunder imobility,� iin iProc. iIEEE iSymp. iComput. iCommun. i(ISCC), iFunchal, iPortugal, iJun. i2014, ipp. i1–6.

[35] K. iC. iLee iet ial., i“A icomprehensive ievaluation iof iRPL iunder imobility,� iInt. iJ. iVeh. iTechnol., ivol. i2012, iMar. i2012, iArt. ino. i904308.
[36] O. iGaddour iet ial., i“Co-RPL: iRPL irouting ifor imobile ilow ipower iwire-less isensor inetworks iusing icorona imechanism,� iin iProc. iIEEE iInt. iSymp. iInd. iEmbedded iSyst. i(SIES), iPisa, iItaly, iJun. i2014, ipp. i200–209.
[37] M. iVuciniˇc,´ iB. iTourancheau, iand iA. iDuda, i“Performance icompari-son iof ithe iRPL iand iLOADng irouting iprotocols iin ia ihome iautomation iscenario,â€� iin iProc. iIEEE iWireless iCommun. iNetw. iConf. i(WCNC), iShanghai, iChina, iApr. i2013, ipp. i1974–1979.
[38] S. iElyengui, iR. iBouhouchi, iand iT. iEzzedine, i“LOADng irouting iproto-col ievaluation ifor ibidirectional idata iflow iin iAMI imesh inetworks,� iInt. iJ. iEmerg. iTechnol. iAdv. iEng., ivol. i3, ino. i6, ipp. i37–43, i2015.
[39] iA. iMayzaud, iA. iSehgal, iR. iBadonnel, iI. iChrisment, iand iJ. iSchönwälder, i“Mitigation iof itopological iinconsistency iattacks iin iRPL-based ilow-power ilossy inetworks,� iInt. iJ. iNetw. iManag., ivol. i25, ino. i5, ipp. i320–339, i2015.
[40] Hyung-Sin iKim, iJeonggil iKo, iDavid iE. iCuller, i“Challenging ithe iIPv6 iRouting iProtocol ifor iLow-Power iand iLossy iNetworks i(RPL): iA iSurvey�, iIEEE iCOMMUNICATIONS iSURVEYS i& iTUTORIALS, iVOL. i19, iNO. i4, iFOURTH iQUARTER i2017