Volume-6 , Issue-3 , Jun 2018, ISSN 2321-3256 (Electronic Version) Go Back

• Open Access   Article

  Realiability Assessment Model to Estimate Quality of the Effective E-Procurement Process in Adoption

  Surabhi Saxena, Devendra Agarwal

  Research Paper | Journal (IJSRNSC)

  Vol.6 , Issue.3 , pp.65-68, Jun-2018

  CrossRef-DOI:   https://doi.org/10.26438/ijsrnsc/v6i3.6568

  Abstract

  Full-Text HTML

  References

  Citation

  Abstract
  The development of reliable software is based on design artifacts and its parameters. Maintain of high reliability require further study based on reliability analysis techniques and approaches that are applicable to software development process. This paper introduces a new reliability assessment model which applicable to high-level designs. The design stage is most important for software development. The multiple linear regression techniques are used to develop the reliability assessment model.

  Key-Words / Index Term
  Quality Factors, Object oriented characteristics, Software development process, Reliability, Assessment Model

  References
  [1] J. Musa, Software reliability engineering, more reliable software
  [2] faster development and testing‖, McGraw-Hill, 1998.
  [3] D. R. Wallace, "Practical software reliability modelling," proceeding of 26th Annual NASA, Software Engineering Workshop, 2001.
  [4] W.L. Wang, M.H. Chen, "Heterogeneous software reliability modelling," proceeding of 13th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, 2002.
  [5] Nidhi Gupta et. al., “Reliability Measurement of Object Oriented Design: Complexity Perspective”, International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology Vol. 2, Issue 4, April 2015.
  [6] J. Bosch, Design & Use of Software Architectures -Adopting and Evolving a Product Line Approach: Addison-Wesley, 2000.
  [7] S. Gokhale, K.S. Trivedi, Analytical Models for Architecture-Based Software Reliability Prediction: A Unification Framework. IEEE Transaction on Reliability, 55 (4), 578-590, 2006.
  [8] Cortellessa, V., Singh, H., Cukic, B. Eerly reliability assessment of UML based software models. In: Third International Workshop on Software and Performance, Rome, 2007.
  [9] M. Jureczko and L. Madeyski, “Towards identifying software project clusters with regard to defect prediction”, IEEE, 2010.
  [10] Surabhi Saxena, Devendra Agarwal, “Model to Quantify Security For Adoption Of Effective E-Procurement Process “, Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), Volume 5, Issue 5- May2018,pp. – 792 -796.
  [11] Surabhi Saxena , Devendra Agarwal , “ Traceability Assessment Model to Estimate Quality of the Effective E-Procurement Process in Adoption”, International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology ( IJETT) , Volume 58 Issue 4 – April 2018 , pp. – 177 – 180
  [12] Surabhi Saxena ,Devendra Agarwal ,“Completeness Assessment Model to Estimate Quality of the Effective E-Procurement Process in Adoption”, International Journal of Management, IT & Engineering ( IJMIE ) , Volume 8 , Issue 6 – June 2018 , pp. – 369-280
  [13] Surabhi Saxena ,Devendra Agarwal ,“Functionality Assessment Model to Estimate Quality of the Effective E-Procurement Process in Adoption”, International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts ( IJCRT ), Volume 6 , Issue 2 – April 2018 , pp. – 274- 278 .
  

  Citation
  Surabhi Saxena, Devendra Agarwal, "Realiability Assessment Model to Estimate Quality of the Effective E-Procurement Process in Adoption," International Journal of Scientific Research in Network Security and Communication, Vol.6, Issue.3, pp.65-68, 2018

• Open Access   Article

  Furnishing of Ethical Associations in Related Structures

  M. Saidireddy

  Research Paper | Journal (IJSRNSC)

  Vol.6 , Issue.3 , pp.69-71, Jun-2018

  CrossRef-DOI:   https://doi.org/10.26438/ijsrnsc/v6i3.6971

  Abstract

  Full-Text HTML

  References

  Citation

  Abstract
  The systems of Peer-To-Peer are motivating towards a foremost paradigm move in the direction of genuinely distributed computing. Classification of peers as moreover trustworthy or untrustworthy is not enough in most of the cases. Metrics should include accuracy hence peers can be ranked consistent with trustworthiness. Metric of reputation is considered on basis of recommendations and it is considered as important when deciding in relation to strangers as well as new acquaintances. When scheming of reputation metric, recommendations are assessed on basis of trust metric of recommendation. In this work we aim at introducing an architecture known as SORT which is a representation of self-organizing Trust intends to reduce malevolent activity in P2P structure by setting up trust associations between peers in their proximity.

  Key-Words / Index Term
  Peer-To-Peer systems, Trustworthiness, Reputation, Trust, Self-organizing trust model, Acquaintance.

  References
  [1] S. Staab, B. Bhargava, L. Lilien, A. Rosenthal, M. Winslett, M. Sloman, T. Dillon, E. Chang, F.K. Hussain, W. Nejdl, D. Olmedilla, and V. Kashyap, “The Pudding of Trust,” IEEE Intelligent Systems,vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 74-88, 2004.
  [2] E. Terzi, Y. Zhong, B. Bhargava, Pankaj, and S. Madria, “An Algorithm for Building User-Role Profiles in a Trust Environment,” Proc. Fourth Int’l Conf. Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery (DaWaK), vol. 2454, 2002.
  [3] S. Saroiu, K. Gummadi, R. Dunn, S.D. Gribble, and H.M. Levy, “An Analysis of Internet Content Delivery Systems,” Proc. Fifth USENIX Symp. Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI), 2002.
  [4] Ahmet Burak Can, and Bharat Bhargava “SORT: A Self-ORganizing Trust Model for Peer-to-Peer Systems”, 2013
  [5] F. Cornelli, E. Damiani, S.D.C. di Vimercati, S. Paraboschi, and P. Samarati, “Implementing a Reputation-Aware Gnutella Servant,” Proc. Networking 2002 Workshops Web Eng. and Peer-to-Peer Computing, 2002.
  [6] H. Yu, M. Kaminsky, P.B. Gibbons, and A. Flaxman, “Sybilguard: Defending against Sybil Attacks via Social Networks,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Comm. Rev., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 267-278, 2006.
  [7] M. Ripeanu, I. Foster, and A. Iamnitchi, “Mapping the Gnutella Network: Properties of Large-Scale Peer-to-Peer Systems and Implications for System Design,” IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 50-57, Jan. 2002.
  [8] M. Virendra, M. Jadliwala, M. Chandrasekaran, and S. Upadhyaya, “Quantifying Trust in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks,” Proc. IEEE Int’l Conf. Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-AgentSystems (KIMAS), 2005.
  [9] Y. Wang and J. Vassileva, “Bayesian Network Trust Model in Peer-to-Peer Networks,” Proc. Second Workshop Agents and Peer-to-Peer Computing at the Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems Conf. (AAMAS), 2003.
  [10] A. Habib, D. Xu, M. Atallah, B. Bhargava, and J. Chuang, “A Tree- Based Forward Digest Protocol to Verify Data Integrity in Distributed Media Streaming,” IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Eng., vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1010-1014, July 2005.
  [11] I. Stoica, R. Morris, D. Karger, M.F. Kaashoek, and H. Balakrishnan, “Chord: A Scalable Peer-to-Peer Lookup Service for InternetApplications,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Comm. Rev., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 149-160, 2001.
  [12] R. Zhou and K. Hwang, “Powertrust: A Robust and Scalable Reputation System for Trusted Peer-to-Peer Computing,” IEEE rans. Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 460-473, Apr. 2007.
  [13] K. Aberer and Z. Despotovic, “Managing Trust in a Peer-2-Peer Information System,” Proc. 10th Int’l Conf. Information and KnowledgeManagement (CIKM), 2001.
  [14] S. Xiao and I. Benbasat, “The Formation of Trust and Distrust in Recommendation Agents in Repeated Interactions: A Process- Tracing Analysis,” Proc. Fifth ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (EC), 2003.
  [15] G. Swamynathan, B.Y. Zhao, and K.C. Almeroth, “Decoupling Service and Feedback Trust in a Peer-to-Peer Reputation System,” Proc. Int’l Conf. Parallel and Distributed Processing and Applications (ISPA), 2005.
  [16] Z. Despotovic and K. Aberer, “Trust-Aware Delivery of Composite Goods,” Proc. First Int’l Conf. Agents and Peer-to-Peer Computing, 2002.
  

  Citation
  M. Saidireddy, "Furnishing of Ethical Associations in Related Structures," International Journal of Scientific Research in Network Security and Communication, Vol.6, Issue.3, pp.69-71, 2018

• Open Access   Article

  Vulnerabilities and Countermeasures on Cloud: A Survey

  Kamal Bunkar, Chhaya Arya

  Survey Paper | Journal (IJSRNSC)

  Vol.6 , Issue.3 , pp.72-79, Jun-2018

  Abstract

  Full-Text HTML

  References

  Citation

  Abstract
  A system, programme, or process that has a vulnerability or flaw that could be used by bad actors to undermine the security or integrity of that system is said to be vulnerable. Organisations must establish a complete cybersecurity strategy that includes routine security assessments, vulnerability scanning, patch management, employee training, and incident response planning in order to reduce vulnerabilities. Protecting systems and data from potential exploitation requires staying up to date on the newest security threats and best practises. Misconfigurations, software defects, insecure APIs (Application Programming Interfaces), and insufficient access controls are only a few of the causes of cloud vulnerabilities. This review paper reviewed different related studies published from 2010 to 2017 from the academia and industry. They classified the security issues as per defined taxonomy with real-life examples that provided a rationale for discussion and highlighted the related impact of the security issues. Security and privacy were cited as important obstacles to the cloud`s rapid rise in earlier research. However, the narrative evaluation offered in this study offers an integrationist end-to-end mapping of cloud security requirements, detected threats, known vulnerabilities, and recommended responses, which appears to be a first-time presentation of this information in one location.

  Key-Words / Index Term
  Attack Classification; Cloud Computing; Threats Classification; Threat Identification; Vulnerabilities

  References
  [1] Akhil D More, Shailesh Nelwade, Avinash Chhabra, Nachiket Bhosale and Abha Pathak, Jan. 2016, „A Review on Privacy Preserving Public Auditing for Data Storage Security?, International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 50 - 56.
  [2] Aized Amin Soofi, Irfan Khan, M and Fazal – e – Amin , May 2014, „A Review on Data Security in Cloud Computing?, International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 94, No. 5, pp. 26 – 35
  [3] H. Takabi, J.B.D. Joshi, G.-J. Ahn, Security and privacy challenges in cloud computing environments, IEEE Secur. Priv. (ISSN: 1540-7993) 8 (6) (2010) 24–31.
  [4] Alevitina Dubovitskaya, Visara Urovi, Matteo Vasirani, Karl Aberer and Michael I. Schumacher, 2015, „A Cloud Based eHealth Architecture for Privacy Preserving Data Integration, IFIP, pp. 585 – 598.
  [5] B. Grobauer, T. Walloschek, E. Stocker, Understanding cloud computing vulnerabilities, IEEE Secur. Priv. (ISSN: 1540-7993) 9 (2) (2011) 50–57.
  [6] S. Subashini, V. Kavitha, A survey on security issues in service delivery models of cloud computing, J. Netw. Comput. Appl. (ISSN: 1084-8045) 34 (1) (2011) 1–11.
  [7] Anantha Lakshmi, M and Shaik Mahammad Rasheed, April 2016, “Integrity Constraints for Cloud Auditing Services Using Third Party Services?, International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 32 – 38
  [8] S. Pearson, Privacy, security and trust in cloud computing, in: S. Pearson, G. Yee (Eds.), Privacy and Security for Cloud Computing, Springer, London, UK, ISBN: 978-1-4471-4189-1, 2013, pp. 3–42.
  [9] N. Phaphoom, X. Wang, S. Samuel, S. Helmer, P. Abrahamsson, A survey study on major technical barriers affecting the decision to adopt cloud services, J. Syst. Softw. (ISSN: 0164-1212) 103 (2015) 167–181.
  [10] K. Hashizume, D.G. Rosado, E. Fernández-Medina, E.B. Fernandez, An analysis of security issues for cloud computing, J. Internet Serv. Appl. (ISSN: 1869-0238) 4 (1) (2013) 1–13.
  [11] Ankush R. Nistane, Shubhangi Sapkal and Deshmukh, R.R, Feb. 2016, „Privacy Preserving Public Auditing and Data Integrity for Secure Cloud Storage Using Cloud Third Party Auditor?, International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 50 - 56.
  [12] C. Modi, D. Patel, B. Borisaniya, A. Patel, M. Rajarajan, A survey on security issues and solutions at different layers of cloud computing, J. Supercomput. (ISSN: 1573-0484) 63 (2) (2013) 561–592.
  [13] L. Coppolino, S. DAntonio, G. Mazzeo, L. Romano, Cloud security: Emerging threats and current solutions, Comput. Electr. Eng. (ISSN: 0045-7906) 59 (2017) 126–140.
  [14] S. Singh, Y.-S. Jeong, J.H. Park, A survey on cloud computing security: Issues, threats, and solutions, J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 75 (2016) 200–222.
  [15] [36] N. Khan, A. Al-Yasiri, Identifying cloud security threats to strengthen cloud computing adoption framework, Procedia Comput. Sci. (ISSN: 1877-0509) 94 (2016) 485–490.
  [16] W. Huang, A. Ganjali, B.H. Kim, S. Oh, D. Lie, The state of public infrastructure-as-a-service cloud security, ACM Comput. Surv. (ISSN: 0360-0300) 47 (4) (2015) 1–31.
  [17] M. Ali, S.U. Khan, A.V. Vasilakos, Security in cloud computing: Opportunities and challenges, Inform. Sci. (ISSN: 0020-0255) 305 (2015) 357–383.
  [18] I.M. Khalil, A. Khreishah, M. Azeem, Cloud computing security: A survey, Computers (ISSN: 2073-431X) 3 (1) (2014) 1–35.
  [19] D.A.B. Fernandes, L.F.B. Soares, J.V. Gomes, M.M. Freire, P.R.M. Inácio, Security issues in cloud environments: a survey, Int. J. Inf. Secur. (ISSN: 1615-5270) 13 (2) (2014) 113–170.
  [20] Z. Xiao, Y. Xiao, Security and privacy in cloud computing, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. (ISSN: 1553-877X) 15 (2) (2013) 843–859.
  [21] D. Zissis, D. Lekkas, Addressing cloud computing security issues, Future Gener. Comput. Syst. (ISSN: 0167-739X) 28 (3) (2012) 583–592.
  [22] L.M. Vaquero, L. Rodero-Merino, D. Morán, Locking the sky: a survey on IaaS cloud security, Computing (ISSN: 1436-5057) 91 (1) (2011) 93–118.
  [23] M.A. Morsy, J. Grundy, I. Müller, An analysis of the cloud computing security problem, in: Proceedings of APSEC 2010 Cloud Workshop, 2010, pp. 1–6.
  [24] Q. Zhang, L. Cheng, R. Boutaba, Cloud computing: state-of-the-art and research challenges, J. Internet Serv. Appl. (ISSN: 1869-0238) 1 (1) (2010) 7–18.
  [25] M. Avram, Advantages and challenges of adopting cloud computing from an enterprise perspective, Procedia Technol. (ISSN: 2212-0173) 12 (2014) 529–534.
  [26] C.-L. Hsu, J.C.-C. Lin, Factors affecting the adoption of cloud services in enterprises, Inf. Syst. E-bus. Manag. (ISSN: 1617-9846) 14 (4) (2016) 791–822.
  [27] F. Liu, J. Tong, J. Mao, R. Bohn, J. Messina, L. Badger, D. Leaf, NIST Cloud Computing Reference Architecture (SP 500-292), National Institute of Standards & Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8930, USA, 2011.
  [28] E. Aguiar, Y. Zhang, M. Blanton, An overview of issues and recent developments in cloud computing and storage security, in: K.J. Han, B.-Y. Choi, S. Song (Eds.), High Performance Cloud Auditing and Applications, Springer, New York, NY, USA, ISBN: 978-1-4614-3296-8, 2014, pp. 3–33.
  [29] C.A. Ardagna, R. Asal, E. Damiani, Q.H. Vu, From security to assurance in the cloud: A survey, ACM Comput. Surv. (ISSN: 0360-0300) 48 (1) (2015) 1–50.

  Citation
  Kamal Bunkar, Chhaya Arya, "Vulnerabilities and Countermeasures on Cloud: A Survey," International Journal of Scientific Research in Network Security and Communication, Vol.6, Issue.3, pp.72-79, 2018